No sandbox environments. No "under ideal conditions." These results were delivered inside live enterprise systems — with production data, existing teams, and real deadlines.
Different platform. Different industry. Same disciplined approach to architectural problems with measurable outcomes.
The client adopted dbt to modernize their data operations — the right tool for the job. But it was implemented without a solid data foundation underneath. Views layered on top of views. Queries hit the warehouse like a sledgehammer when they should have been surgical. Within two days of going live, the client burned through their entire monthly Snowflake credit allotment.
Two days. A full month's budget. Gone.
And the data coming out the other end wasn't even accurate. Key business metrics were being double-counted — meaning the numbers leadership was acting on were wrong.
The client's Azure Data Factory environment powered their Enterprise Data Warehouse — daily and hourly pipelines moving large volumes of data from raw to structured zones and into SQL. It worked. But it was expensive and slow.
No radical re-engineering — the existing pipelines encoded years of business logic.
The client operated on ephemeral Spark clusters and Redshift. Hundreds of interdependent scripts. ETL that routinely exceeded 24 hours — for a process that was supposed to run daily. A flat-table data lake model riddled with inaccuracies and duplications.
When a number was wrong — and numbers were frequently wrong — nobody could trace it back through hundreds of scripts to find where the error was introduced. Troubleshooting wasn't difficult. It was effectively impossible.
The infrastructure hadn't been designed. It had accumulated.
Migrated the client to managed Snowflake with dbt for transformations and Apache Airflow for orchestration — a rethinking of the data architecture from the ground up.
Across financial services, healthcare, pharmaceutical, manufacturing, government, and more.
They didn't just fix the symptoms — they redesigned the foundation. For the first time in 18 months, our data team isn't fighting infrastructure. We're building on it.
Our Azure bill was the thing keeping me up at night. They came in, identified five specific levers, pulled them without breaking anything, and delivered exactly what they said they would.
We'd been living with a 24-hour pipeline that nobody could explain. Three weeks in, it ran in minutes. The team could finally spend time on work that actually matters.
Your specific situation is unique. The architectural pattern underneath it probably isn't. One conversation will tell us both whether there's a clear path to measurable ROI.

No data foundation
Nested views cascaded compute costs with every query
No refresh optimization
Data reprocessed 10× more frequently than required
Metrics layer errors
Key business metrics double-counted decisions based on wrong numbers

551-min daily loads
Over 9 hours for daily pipeline execution
299-min hourly loads
Nearly 5 hours for what should run every hour
~90% of cloud spend
A single service dominating the entire monthly bill
24+ hour ETL
Daily pipeline couldn't complete within its own cycle
Untraceable errors
Hundreds of scripts with no lineage or testability
Cluster sprawl
Expensive ephemeral infrastructure with no governance
"Macer Consulting didn't just give us a report; they embedded with our team and fixed architecture problems that had been costing us six figures a month for years."
"The ROI was evident within the first 30 days. Our data reliability went from 'questionable' to 'mission-critical' almost overnight."
"Professional, deeply technical, and business-focused. They understand that data architecture is a financial lever, not just a tech problem."
© 2026 Macer Consulting • All Rights Reserved.