No sandbox environments. No "under ideal conditions." These results were delivered inside live enterprise systems — with production data, existing teams, and real deadlines.
Different platform. Different industry. Same disciplined approach to architectural problems with measurable outcomes.
The client adopted dbt to modernize their data operations — the right tool for the job. But it was implemented without a solid data foundation underneath. Views layered on top of views. Queries hit the warehouse like a sledgehammer when they should have been surgical. Within two days of going live, the client burned through their entire monthly Snowflake credit allotment.
Two days. A full month's budget. Gone.
And the data coming out the other end wasn't even accurate. Key business metrics were being double-counted — meaning the numbers leadership was acting on were wrong.
The client's Azure Data Factory environment powered their Enterprise Data Warehouse — daily and hourly pipelines moving large volumes of data from raw to structured zones and into SQL. It worked. But it was expensive and slow.
No radical re-engineering — the existing pipelines encoded years of business logic.
The client operated on ephemeral Spark clusters and Redshift. Hundreds of interdependent scripts. ETL that routinely exceeded 24 hours — for a process that was supposed to run daily. A flat-table data lake model riddled with inaccuracies and duplications.
When a number was wrong — and numbers were frequently wrong — nobody could trace it back through hundreds of scripts to find where the error was introduced. Troubleshooting wasn't difficult. It was effectively impossible.
The infrastructure hadn't been designed. It had accumulated.
Migrated the client to managed Snowflake with dbt for transformations and Apache Airflow for orchestration — a rethinking of the data architecture from the ground up.
Across financial services, healthcare, pharmaceutical, manufacturing, government, and more.
They didn't just fix the symptoms — they redesigned the foundation. For the first time in 18 months, our data team isn't fighting infrastructure. We're building on it.
Our Azure bill was the thing keeping me up at night. They came in, identified five specific levers, pulled them without breaking anything, and delivered exactly what they said they would.
We'd been living with a 24-hour pipeline that nobody could explain. Three weeks in, it ran in minutes. The team could finally spend time on work that actually matters.
Your specific situation is unique. The architectural pattern underneath it probably isn't. One conversation will tell us both whether there's a clear path to measurable ROI.

No data foundation
Nested views cascaded compute costs with every query
No refresh optimization
Data reprocessed 10× more frequently than required
Metrics layer errors
Key business metrics double-counted decisions based on wrong numbers

551-min daily loads
Over 9 hours for daily pipeline execution
299-min hourly loads
Nearly 5 hours for what should run every hour
~90% of cloud spend
A single service dominating the entire monthly bill
24+ hour ETL
Daily pipeline couldn't complete within its own cycle
Untraceable errors
Hundreds of scripts with no lineage or testability
Cluster sprawl
Expensive ephemeral infrastructure with no governance
"I would definitely recommend working with Macer. You and Dane displayed deep Power BI expertise, and data analytics skills in general. You were very responsive and easy to work with. You went above and beyond and provided recommendations for architecture/design best practices, and did extensive validation before handing over iterations for my team to test."

"When we were looking for a trusted partner to advise on and implement a transformation of our analytic data platform, Reeves and Macer were exactly the right choice. They brought both strategic clarity and hands-on execution, helping us adopt modern technologies and modernize our engineering practices across the full data layer. Macer provided the resources for every phase of the journey: ideation, vendor analysis, architecture, standards, implementation, operations, and maintenance. There is no question in my mind that they will remain a trusted partner throughout this modernization effort. For projects large and small, any analytics leader needing to hit aggressive timelines with dependable and scalable architecture should talk to Macer right away."

"We've had a long term engagement with Reeves and Macer Consulting for the last few years for data engineering services. During this time, Reeves has consistently exceeded all expectations. His skills have been essential for the successful deployment of our current data platform, where he contributed not just to the selection of every tool in use but the implementation as well. He doesn't hesitate to chip in wherever helpful, on many occasions in areas well outside his responsibilities, and he brings an enthusiastic, friendly personality to every encounter. As of today nearly the entire business has been directly, positively impacted by his work. Reeves is, in my experience, a rare example of a consultant that genuinely works not just to the letter of the contract but to the improvement of the people and environment he finds himself in as well. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend him and Macer Consulting to anyone in search of data services. The skills and people are absolutely top notch."

© 2026 Macer Consulting • All Rights Reserved.